Soft Contact Lens Solutions: Is Simple Really Better?
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||||||||
Title |
Title
Title
Soft Contact Lens Solutions: Is Simple Really Better?
|
||||||||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||||||||
Description |
Description
Background: Many soft contact lens disinfecting systems claim simplicity and convenience. This study will show the actual time savings these systems provide, along
with their estimated annual cost. Methods: Five experienced soft contact lens wearers tested six disinfection systems: ReNu, Opti-Free, AOSEPT, UltraCare, Quick Care, and Pure Eyes. Complete, Opti-One, Opti-Free Express, Flex Care, and Hydrocare are considered equivalents in this study, and are also compared. Results: The quickest systems tested are the multi-purpose solutions, providing a 28 to 78 percent time savings over the other systems. They are also significantly less expensive than most other systems. Conclusions: Simplicity and convenience are important considerations in prescribing a soft contact lens disinfection system, but other factors must be included in determining the individual best system for each patient. |
||||||||||
Handle |
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/2323/4217
|
||||||||||
Persons |
Persons
Author (aut): Peterson, Jeff
|
||||||||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||||||||
Subject |
Subject
|
||||||||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||||||||
Note |
Note
This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Optometry. 11 pages.
|
||||||||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
||||||||||
Language |
Language
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
bitstream_10717.pdf
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
4761451
|
Media Use | |
Authored on |
|