Differences In Perceptions And Preferences Regarding Eyecare Among Four Racial Subgroups In Lower Michigan

Background: This investigation consists of a survey to Caucasian, African-American,
Hispanic, and Asian populations of Michigan's Lower Peninsula. The first component of
the survey explores their perceptions of eye care including the frequency and quality of
optometric care. The second portion of the survey analyzes their preferences of ideal eye
care delivery. The survey will procure valuable information which can help to understand
and be able to meet the desires for each race. The results are analyzed to determine the
differences in opinions regarding optometric care in the region. Methods: Surveys were distributed randomly to the public in various settings totaling 136 people with at least 30 from each race. Results of surveys from each race were compared to each other and to all races. Results: Similarities were discovered among the races' opinions regarding how long
an eye exam should take, how much they would be willing to pay for a complete eye exam, and that the race or gender of their eye care provider did not matter. There were differences with the frequency of eye exams among the races. Asians seek eye care the least frequently when compared to the other races. Hispanic and Asian respondents are least likely to know that optometrists can detect systemic disease with a thorough eye exam including dilation. Conclusions: Much ofthe public is still unsure about the role of Optometrists (ODs) and
Ophthalmologists (OMDs). Minority groups such as Hispanics and Asians do not seek eye care services as oflen as others, and may have less understanding of the importance of eye care. Most races do not have a preference regarding race or gender of their eye care practitioner. Quality the most important factor regarding eye exams and eye glasses.