A Comparison Study Of 3 Auto-Refractors And How The Correlated To The Standard Subjective Refraction For Accuracy, Validity And Efficiency Of Use.
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||||||||
Title |
Title
Title
A Comparison Study Of 3 Auto-Refractors And How The Correlated To The Standard Subjective Refraction For Accuracy, Validity And Efficiency Of Use.
|
||||||||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||||||||
Description |
Description
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy, validity, and efficiency of three auto-refractors. The accuracy will be determined by comparing the auto-refraction results to the proven gold standard of a subjective refraction. The efficiency of the auto-refraction units will be determined by the time needed to complete the autorefraction. The three types of auto-refractor units include two handheld models, the Nikon Retinomax and the portable Welch Allyn SureSight, and a standard non-mobile (table-top) Topcon unit. Refractive data was collected for 63 subjects so that conclusions on the accuracy, validity, and efficiency the three auto-refractors can be made.
|
||||||||||
Handle |
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/2323/4060
|
||||||||||
Persons |
Persons
Author (aut): Videtich, Rita
Author (aut): Jones, Amy
|
||||||||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||||||||
Subject | |||||||||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||||||||
Note |
Note
This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Optometry. 12 pages.
|
||||||||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
||||||||||
Language |
Language
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
bitstream_10338.pdf
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
4098430
|
Media Use | |
Authored on |
2022-02-12
|