A Comparison Of Anti-Fogging Agents.
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||||||||
Title |
Title
Title
A Comparison Of Anti-Fogging Agents.
|
||||||||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||||||||
Description |
Description
Sports and activities that require the usage of goggles or protective eyewear are numerous in this country. Racketball, handball, tennis, woodworking, and countless other events need
adequate eye protection to insure the safety of the participants. Unfortunately, the eyewear has performance problems, one of which is fogging of the l enses. Fogging impairs the acuity and restricts the peripheral view of the wearer, thus decreasing performance. Several different companies have come up with anti-fogging agents to combat this problem, but no records of their relative performance are available. This study's purpose is to make that comparison. |
||||||||||
Handle |
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/2323/4542
|
||||||||||
Persons |
Persons
Author (aut): Graham, Rhonda
Author (aut): Farrell, Rob
|
||||||||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||||||||
Subject |
Subject
|
||||||||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||||||||
Note |
Note
This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Optometry. 9 pages.
|
||||||||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
||||||||||
Language |
Language
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
bitstream_10999.pdf
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
1607895
|
Media Use | |
Authored on |
2022-02-12
|