Common Factors in Multifocal Contact Lens Dissatisfaction
Digital Document
Document
Content type |
Content type
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||||||||
Title |
Title
Title
Common Factors in Multifocal Contact Lens Dissatisfaction
|
||||||||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||||||||
Description |
Description
Background: This research project aims to better understand factors contributing to the
dissatisfaction of soft multifocal contact lens wearers, leading to better patient outcomes for future lens selection. Methods: Patients were recruited based on a negative response to the question βIs/was your contact lens use meeting your expectations for success?β. A documented comprehensive eye exam within the last two years and previous fitting/use of a soft multifocal lens were also used as inclusion/exclusion criteria. Twelve study participants were analyzed for their wearing and lens care habits/time, style/design of lens, high and low contrast visual acuity, occupation, visual tasks while wearing their lenses, refractive and ocular measurements, allergies, systemic and ocular medications, personality traits, expectations, age, quality of life, previous lens wear and number of lenses necessary to be fit successfully. The collected data was then compared to values from a partner study of successful multifocal contact lens wearers. Results: No significant differences in distance acuity, habitual working distance, activities of daily living, or personality were found between the satisfied and dissatisfied study groups. Significant differences were found for objective and subjective measurements of near and intermediate vision between the two groups. The average coma for unsuccessful patients not wearing multifocal lenses iv was higher compared to successful patients while not wearing multifocal lenses (0.63 versus. 0.50). Although it was not statistically significant, it was very close (p = 0.53). Average pupil size differences were found also to be significantly larger (by an average of 0.5 mm) in unsuccessful patients. Conclusions: Complete fitting of candidates for multifocal contact lens correction should include average pupil testing to increase lens satisfaction. Further testing for induced aberrations should be conducted to determine significance in multifocal lens satisfaction. Future multifocal lens design could be further refined if pupil size and induced aberrations were considered. |
||||||||||
Handle |
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/2323/6076
|
||||||||||
Persons |
Persons
Author (aut): Carmen, Gabrielle
Author (aut): Smiley, Chan
|
||||||||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||||||||
Subject | |||||||||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||||||||
Note |
Note
This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Optometry.27 pages.
|
||||||||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
||||||||||
Language |
Language
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
bitstream_15652.pdf
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
805289
|
Media Use | |
Authored on |
|
Download
Document